Major Themes and Issues in the Play
Idealistic Leadership
What makes the Sultan‘s character more fascinating is his paradoxical and complex nature.
He is portrayed as ―a dreamer and a man of action, benevolent and cruel, devout and callous.‖
U.R. Anantha Murty remarks: ―Both Tughlaq and his enemies initially appear to be idealists;
yet in the pursuit of the ideal, they perpetrate its opposite. The whole play is structured on
these opposites: the ideal and the real: the divine aspiration and the deft intrigue.‖ These
opposites constitute the main charm of the structure of Tughlaq. Tughlaq promises his
Subjects to maintain ―justice, equality, progress and peace -- not just peace but a more
purposeful life‖ ―without any consideration of might and weakness, religion or creed.‖ But to
a great surprise he could not win the hearts of his public.
He wants to give his ―beloved people‖ peace, freedom, justice and progress. He says that his
people would witness how justice works in my kingdom - without any consideration of might
or weakness, religion or creed. But his ascendancy over the throne of Delhi makes him ―at
once a dreamer and a man of action, benevolent and cruel, devout and godless. His two close
associates- Barani, the scholarly historian and Najib, the politician seem to represent the two
opposite selves of Tughlaq, while Aziz, the wily time server appears to represent all those
who took advantage of Sultan‘s visionary schemes and fooled him.‖
Indeed Tughlaq was at first an idealist but as time passed on his idealism failed and he turned
to be a shrewd politician, a callous and heartless murderer and intriguer who employed
religion for his political motives and even hurled the country into turmoil and troubles. Thus
the play ―explores the paradox of pseudo – idealistic Sultan Muhammad Tughlaq, whose
reign is regarded as a spectacular failure in India‘s history.‖ As an idealist and visionary, a
rationalist and forward looking emperor Tughlaq tried to introduce his kingdom into an
egalitarian society. But he found the circumstances not favorable to rule because the country
was divided between Islam and Hinduism. There was much animosity between the Hindus
and Muslims. Tughlaq began to make efforts to bring about harmony between the two
communities, justice and equality for all for the welfare of his people. He said:
―May this moment burn bright and light up our path towards greater justice, equality,
progress and peace – not just peace but a more purposeful life.‖
Tughlaq wanted to be an enlightened and liberal despot and tried hard to find the cooperation
of his subjects, which was denied to him due to the bigotry and orthodoxy of his people. The
people fail to understand his idealism and reformatory zeal, and condemn him as an enemy of
Islam. In fact, he is a devout Muslim with full faith in the Holy Koran but his rationalistic and
ideal views are beyond the comprehension of his subjects. However, the young people admire
and support the liberal and secular policies of the Sultan whose rationalistic and modernized
attitude appeals the youth. To him, ―The country‘s in perfectly safe hands – safer than any
you‘ve seen before‖. No other Sultan before Tughlaq allowed ―a subject within a mile‘s
distance‖. It is he who made prayer five times a day compulsory for all Muslims as dictated
in the Koran. The Young man further advocates him and says:
―Now you pray five times a day because that‘s the law and if you break it, you‘ll have the
officers on your neck. Can you mention one earlier Sultan in whose time people read the
Koran in the streets like now?
Religious Tolerance as a Political Strategy
The Sultan practiced the idea of brother hood, which is an important aspect of human values
in Islam, and this in turn annoyed the ecclesiastics because it undermined their political
interests. The efforts of the Sultan to bridge the difference between Hindus and Muslims
invited anger and displeasure of the Mullahs and Maulavis. To unite them, he abolished the
jiziya tax and openly declared that both Hindus and Muslims would be treated impartially and
would be equal in the eyes of the law. But this made him a suspect both in the eyes of the
Hindus and the Muslims. The Old Man in the first scene mocked at the Sultan‘s liberal
attitude towards Hindus:
―Beware of the Hindu who embraces you. Before you know what, he‘ll turn Islam into
another caste and call the prophet an incarnation of his god….‖
Even Hindus, who were prospering and exempted from jiziya taxes, never trusted on their
part. They bore with such insults silently. A Hindu expresses his anguish in the following
words:
―We didn‘t want an exemption! Look, when a Sultan kicks me in the teeth and says, ‗Pay up,
you Hindu dog‘; I‘m happy. I know I‘m safe. But the moment a man comes along and says, ‗I
know you are a Hindu, but you are also a human being‘ – well, that makes me nervous.‖
The young Muslim reacted sharply and violently to this statement of the Hindu and called
him ―Ungrateful wretch.‖ Tughlaq remained an idealist and visionary throughout his life. As
he said to his Step Mother: ―I pray to the Almighty to save me from sleep. All day long I
have to worry about tomorrow but it‘s only when the night falls that I can step beyond all
that.‖ Even at the height of frustration he did not give up his visions and idealism. He tells the
Young Man:
―Nineteen. Nice age! An age when you think you can clasp the whole world in your palm like
a rare diamond. I was twenty-one when I came to Daulatabad first, and built this fort. I
supervised the placing of every brick in it and I said to myself, one day I shall build my own
history like this, brick by brick.‖
By temperament Tughlaq was a rationalist and philosopher and he wanted to build up a
powerful and united nation. The far-sighted Tughlaq announced his policy to shift the capital
by saying that ―this is no mad whim of a tyrant. My ministers and I took this decision after
careful thought and discussion‖(3). The decision to shift the capital from Delhi to Daulatabad
was taken because ―My empire is large now and embraces the South and I need a capital
which is at its heart. Delhi is too near the border and as you well know its peace is never free
from the fear of invaders. But for me the most important factor is that Daulatabad is a city of
Hindus and as the capital it will symbolize the bond between Muslims and Hindus which I
wish to develop and strengthen in my Kingdom. I invite you all to accompany me to
Daulatabad. This is only an invitation and not an order. Only those who have faith in me may
come with me. With their help I shall build an empire which will be the envy of the world.‖
Tughlaq‘s rash decision to change the capital from Delhi to Daulatabad is a turning point
in Tughlaq, which results in untold and inexpressible suffering to the common people. Prayer
and religion are vitiated for power and money. Prayer is used to achieve an end and not an
end in itself. The word ‗prayer‘ is repeated several times and it reverberates throughout the
play. Karnad dexterously shows how prayer affects the ruler and the masses. The powerful,
the prosperous and the rulers can pray in peace. The poor who are exploited and empty
stomachs cannot even think of prayer. Their prayer is only to earn bread by the sweat of
brow. To Tughlaq it was a masquerade to hide his guilty conscience and to the hungry people
it was luxury. In the atmosphere of atrociousness, cruelty, killing, sobs and sighs, wailing and
tears which India had during the reign of Muhammad, it was very difficult for the people to
pray.
Disguise
Disguise is an important theatrical strategy in the play. It on the one hand undermines the
seriousness with which the Sultan‘s plans are made and on the other, mocks at his idealism.
The dramatist ironically presents Aziz, the dhobi, who disguises himself as Brahmin, and
later appears in the guise of the great grandson of ―His Imperial Holiness Abbasid, the Khalif
of Baghdad‖. He is invited by the Sultan to Dualtabad to bless the country and to start the
banned prayer. An announcement is made so that all the citizens may welcome His Holiness
for, ―This is a holy day for - us - a day of joy! And its glory will be crowned by the fact that
the Public Prayer, which has been mute in our land these five years, will be started again
from next Friday. Henceforth every Muslim will pray five times a day as enjoined by the
Holy Koran and declare himself a faithful slave of the Lord.‖
Muhammad welcomes His Holiness with these words:
―We have waited for years for this joyful moment. Our streets have waited in silence for the
moment when the call to the holy prayer will ring in them again. And each year has been a
century. We have waited long, Your Holiness, and our sins have become shadows that
entwine round our feet. They have become our dumbness and deprived us of prayer. They
have become the fiery sun and burnt up our crops. Now the moment has come for me and my
people to rejoice. Only you can save me now, Your Holiness, only the dust of your feet on
my head can save me now.‖
It is a great ironic act that Tughlaq, the mighty and the most powerful, falls at the feet of
Ghiyas-ud-din Abbasid, disguised Aziz. The great and shrewd politician of his time wants to
seek shelter at the feet of a religious man not knowing the dust of the feet he is taking on his
head, is that of a common man. Here the great emperor becomes an object of pity as his
dreams of the monarch are shattered. Politics fails and the realm of religion begins to prevail
over politics. Karnad succeeds in presenting the common man in disguised is more powerful
than the Sultan for the royalty has to bow down to him. The last scene becomes more ironical
because the Sultan, who initiates the prayer after five years, falls asleep.
Symbolism
The play Tughlaq is noted for its symbols. Four symbols like prayer, sleep, the game of chess
and the rose are used to heighten the effect of the play. As P. Bayapa Reddy remarks: ―At the
micro level, prayer symbolizes the religious idealism of Tughlaq. At the macro level, it
connects man‘s unconscious need for divine protection and guidance in an hour of anguish.
In the beginning prayer is made compulsory but later it is banned for a few years and again it
is revived. It is reduced to a mockery when the Sultan‘s life is threatened at the time of
prayer. ‗Sleep‘ on one level represents the need for rest in man‘s life. At the macro level it
becomes symbolic of peace, which eludes man often. The rose is a symbol of the aesthetic
and poetic susceptibilities of Tughlaq. It later on becomes a symbol of the withering away of
all the dreams and ideals of Tughlaq. At the macro level, the game of chess is an ordinary
game which is popular in India. It also symbolizes a political game in which an ordinary
washer man checkmates the most intelligent and clever politician. Through this symbolist
technique, the playwright has succeeded in creating the right political atmosphere ….‖
Rulers and politicians use religion as a medium to befool the common man. They pollute
religion by misusing it for fulfilling their dirty political motives. But religion cannot be used
to serve the end of those who are in power because it preaches morals and expects morality
from the people. It stands for virtue, goodness, righteousness and moral conduct while
politics thrives on intrigue, craftiness, dishonesty and deceit. The case of Tughlaq is no
exception. What Karnad shows in Tughlaq is that the idealist and his idealism do not go hand
in hand with a politician and his politics. The idealist is only a misnomer and he has to face
challenges, which he tries to curb down in his own crafty manner. But the idealist Tughlaq
fails in producing any lasting result. What he gains, as he tells, is: ―Not words but the sword –
that‘s all I have to keep my faith in my mission‖ and ―power, strength to shape my thoughts,
strength to act, strength to recognize my self‖(66). All his idealism is shattered in the game of
politics and thrown to the winds. Even Barani, the best of his advisors, asks Muhammad, who
is a man of great learning,
―You are a learned man, Your Majesty, you are known the world over for your knowledge of
philosophy and poetry. History is not made only in statecraft; its lasting results are produced
in the ranks of learned men. That‘s where you belong, Your Majesty, in the company of
learned men. And further, Your Majesty, there was a time when you believe in love, in peace,
in God. What has happened to those ideals? You won‘t let your subject pray. You torture
them for the smallest offence. Hang them on suspicion. Why this bloodshed?‖
The murder of the Sheikh leads to the intrigues of the courtiers and other idealists of the
kingdom. This happening unites the Hindus and the Muslims altogether to rise against the
craftiness and tyranny of the Sultan. Shihab-ud-din, the most trusted of the friends of Sultan
is persuaded to attend the meeting of the intriguers and at last to stand against the Sultan.
Sheikh Shams-ud-din Tajuddarfim tells Shihab-ud-din that he is attending the meeting to save
Islam not to ―get mixed up in the treacherous games of politicians…. But Allah isn‘t only for
me,… while tyranny crushes the faithful into dust, how can I continue to hide in my
hole?‖(32).
Religion-Politics Interface
Tughlaq is of great interest as it combines religion and politics of an idealist and visionary
Sultan Muhammad Tughlaq. It intends to show that idealism of the ruler will fail and will
ruin the idealist. The concepts like secularism, equality and unity in a country like India are
very much ahead of the times. In India people still are led away by the saints and religious
heads. They believe more their religious leaders than a politician. The fiery speeches of the
religious saint swing people this side or that side for the vote. People still are befooled by
them as they were during the reign of Tughlaq. Thus the life of the people is governed and
corrupted by the interaction of the saints and the politicians. Tughlaq, who pretends to be a
true follower of religion, commits numberless murders to retain his monarchy. He commits
patricide, fratricide and wipes off the religious and political leaders like Imam-ud-din and
Shihab-ud-din for his kingship. He tells the cause of murdering them to his Step Mother in a
simple way: ―They couldn‘t bear the weight of their crown. They couldn‘t leave it aside so
they died senile in their youth or were murdered‖.
When Step-Mother accepts that she has murdered Najib, Muhammad does not accept this
truth. But when she argues, ―It was easier than killing one‘s father or brother. It was better
than killing Sheikh Imam-ud-din,‖ Muhammad replies, ―I killed them for an ideal. Don‘t I
know its results? Don‘t you think I‘ve suffered from the curse? My mother won‘t speak to me
– I can‘t even look into a mirror for fear of seeing their faces in it‖ (65). Muhammad is torn
in finding peace in his own kingdom that ―has become a kitchen of death‖ (65). There is only
one punishment for treachery, he tells his Step-Mother, it is death. And for killing Najib he
orders even his Step-Mother whom he loves more than anyone else to be stoned, dragged and
killed.
Agony and the Notion of Repentance
The innumerable murders that Tughlaq is involved in don‘t bring him peace. They tear him
from within. He feels lonely and frustrated. In such torn and wretched state he seeks the
shelter of God who can only save him from misery and the ghosts of the murdered. Only He
can help him to be a man. For this all of a sudden Tughlaq, the mighty murderer, plunderer
and sinner, falls to his knees and clutches his hands to his breast to pray:
―God, God in Heaven, please help me. Please don‘t let go of my hand. My skin drips with
blood and I don‘t know how much of it is mine and how much of others. I started in Your
path, Lord, why am I wandering naked in this desert now? I started in search of you. Why am
I become a pig rolling in this gory mud? Raise me. Clean me. Cover me with your Infinite
Mercy. I can only clutch at the hem of Your Cloak with my bloody fingers and plead. I can
only beg—have pity on me. I have no one but you now. Only you. Only you … you … you
… you ….‖
The above passage reveals a Faustian cry of anguish, which comes from the mouth of Sultan.
This Sultan uses his opponents like pawns on the chessboard of politics and unscrupulously
kills them. Tughlaq even fails to offer prayer, which is reintroduced after an interval of five
years when Ghiyas-ud-din Abbasid disguised Aziz comes to Daultabad to bless him. He falls
soundly asleep and gets up when the Muezzin‘s call to prayer fades away. His bloody actions
are the result of his intense ambition to establish an idealistic leadership as the norm. The
failure of his political methods unnerves him and makes him insane.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteLiterally this article is very good ...I get a lot from it ....And it helps me ... Thanks 😊😊
DeleteSuperb! It is that I need in my answer.thank you. Your blog such a helpful for me
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteQuite easy and helpful.
ReplyDeletethanks for helping me out with this play and in understanding the play better
ReplyDeletethank you so much ...very helpfull your notes
ReplyDeleteCan you please explain about betrayals in this play
ReplyDeleteKhamsamida
ReplyDeletethank you for this awesome blog darling Divya.....
ReplyDelete